Compare Aikido Security and Jit 
At a Glance
Market Segments
Small-Business (79.2% of reviews)
Mid-Market (44.2% of reviews)
Entry-Level Pricing
Free
No pricing available
Aikido Security
Star Rating
(140)4.6 out of 5
Market Segments
Small-Business (79.2% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
Free
Free Trial is available
Browse all 12 pricing plansJit
Star Rating
(43)4.5 out of 5
Market Segments
Mid-Market (44.2% of reviews)
Pros & Cons
Entry-Level Pricing
No pricing available
Learn more about JitSummary
AI Generated Summary
AI-generated. Powered by real user reviews.
- G2 reviewers report that Aikido Security excels in providing a robust free tier, offering meaningful features that are genuinely usable in day-to-day engineering workflows. Users appreciate the value it delivers without the limitations often found in free plans, making it a strong choice for small businesses.
- Users say that Jit stands out for its lightweight setup and seamless integration with GitHub and CI/CD pipelines. Reviewers highlight how it simplifies the management of security controls within their development workflow, allowing them to catch vulnerabilities early without adding complexity.
- Reviewers mention that Aikido Security's ease of setup is a significant advantage, with many users noting how quickly they could add projects and start gaining insights into their codebase. This user-friendly approach is particularly beneficial for teams looking to streamline their security processes.
- According to verified reviews, Jit is praised for its efficiency in reducing waste and improving cash flow by producing only what is needed. This focus on efficiency resonates well with users who value streamlined processes in their development environments.
- G2 reviewers highlight that Aikido Security provides a comprehensive dashboard that allows non-developers to manage issues effectively, acting as an additional set of eyes for development teams. This feature enhances collaboration and oversight, making it easier for teams to address security concerns.
- Users report that while Jit has a strong focus on integrating security practices into development workflows, it currently lacks the volume of recent reviews compared to Aikido Security. This may indicate a need for further user engagement or updates to maintain its competitive edge in the market.
Pricing
Entry-Level Pricing
Aikido Security
Free (forever)
Free
For developers and curious minds
- Up to 2 users, 10 repos, 2 container images, 1 domain, 1 cloud account, 2 AI AutoFixes/mo & 250k protected requests/mo
- Dependency Scanning (SCA)
- SAST & AI SAST
Jit
No pricing availableFree Trial
Aikido Security
Free Trial is available
Jit
No trial information availableRatings
Meets Requirements
8.9
124
8.9
42
Ease of Use
9.4
125
9.0
42
Ease of Setup
9.5
117
9.2
37
Ease of Admin
9.4
71
9.1
27
Quality of Support
9.4
99
9.3
42
Has the product been a good partner in doing business?
9.4
65
9.6
26
Product Direction (% positive)
9.4
123
9.7
43
Features by Category
Administration
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Analysis
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Testing
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Administration
8.6
64
8.1
22
Feature Not Available
8.0
22
Analysis
8.8
62
8.1
26
9.0
57
8.1
25
9.1
64
8.9
25
8.9
63
9.0
20
Testing
7.3
42
6.6
20
7.0
42
6.9
20
8.1
43
8.7
20
8.5
47
8.3
20
8.2
43
8.2
17
Feature Not Available
8.9
19
8.0
52
7.4
18
Agentic AI - Static Application Security Testing (SAST)
8.3
27
Not enough data
Administration
Not enough data
8.7
17
Feature Not Available
8.8
16
Analysis
9.2
22
8.6
16
9.2
22
8.9
15
9.4
22
9.2
16
9.4
23
9.4
16
9.5
21
9.2
14
Testing
6.9
18
7.5
14
Feature Not Available
8.5
14
8.6
19
8.8
13
8.1
19
8.5
13
Feature Not Available
9.0
14
6.7
19
7.3
14
Administration
8.8
36
Not enough data
8.1
34
Not enough data
9.0
34
Not enough data
8.3
32
Not enough data
Monitoring
8.6
35
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Protection
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.4
33
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
Performance
8.8
62
8.3
21
Feature Not Available
8.4
21
7.8
59
7.6
21
8.9
61
8.6
22
Network
8.0
58
8.0
21
8.0
55
7.1
21
8.1
56
8.4
22
Application
7.2
52
7.0
21
8.9
57
8.6
24
8.0
50
8.3
20
Agentic AI - Vulnerability Scanner
7.7
23
Not enough data
7.6
24
Not enough data
Functionality - Software Composition Analysis
9.0
21
8.3
7
9.0
21
8.8
7
9.0
21
8.9
6
Effectiveness - Software Composition Analysis
8.8
22
8.1
9
9.0
21
8.5
8
9.1
21
8.3
9
Responses
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Automation - AI Agents
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Platform
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Autonomy - AI Agents
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Generative AI
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Documentation
9.7
10
8.6
23
9.7
11
8.3
23
8.5
10
8.5
24
Security
8.2
14
7.9
25
8.9
11
8.2
23
8.5
11
8.3
24
Configuration
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
7.8
20
Not enough data
7.7
19
Not enough data
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.3
20
Not enough data
Visibility
8.6
23
Not enough data
7.9
20
Not enough data
Vulnerability Management
Feature Not Available
Not enough data
8.8
21
Not enough data
8.8
21
Not enough data
9.1
22
Not enough data
Security
Feature Not Available
8.6
11
9.0
14
8.6
11
Feature Not Available
8.6
11
8.9
15
8.8
12
Tracking
7.9
12
8.6
11
7.3
11
8.3
11
8.5
13
8.8
12
Risk management - Application Security Posture Management (ASPM)
9.0
21
8.5
14
8.5
19
8.5
14
8.9
19
8.2
15
8.4
19
8.1
14
Integration and efficiency - Application Security Posture Management (ASPM)
9.1
19
8.7
15
8.9
18
8.7
15
Reporting and Analytics - Application Security Posture Management (ASPM)
8.3
19
8.1
15
8.5
19
8.6
15
7.7
19
7.8
16
Agentic AI - Application Security Posture Management (ASPM)
7.5
6
Not enough data
7.5
6
Not enough data
Cloud-Native Application Protection Platform (CNAPP)Hide 11 FeaturesShow 11 Features
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security - Cloud-Native Application Protection Platform (CNAPP)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Artificial Intelligence - Cloud-Native Application Protection Platform (CNAPP)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Cloud Configuration Management - Cloud-Native Application Protection Platform (CNAPP)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - Cloud-Native Application Protection Platform (CNAPP)
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Performance - AI AppSec Assistants
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Integration - AI AppSec Assistants
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Cloud Visibility
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Security
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Identity
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Agentic AI - AI Agents
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Not enough data
Categories
Categories
Shared Categories
Aikido Security and Jit are categorized as Software Supply Chain Security Tools, Application Security Posture Management (ASPM), Software Composition Analysis, Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST), Static Application Security Testing (SAST), Vulnerability Scanner, and Secure Code Review
Unique Categories
Aikido Security is categorized as Penetration Testing, AI AppSec Assistants, Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM), Container Security, and Cloud-Native Application Protection Platform (CNAPP)
Jit is categorized as Build Automation and AI Agents For Business Operations
Reviews
Reviewers' Company Size
Aikido Security
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Jit
Small-Business(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise(> 1000 emp.)
Small-Business
(50 or fewer emp.)
Mid-Market
(51-1000 emp.)
Enterprise
(> 1000 emp.)
Reviewers' Industry
Computer Software
37.6%
Information Technology and Services
16.0%
Computer & Network Security
7.2%
Hospital & Health Care
5.6%
Financial Services
4.0%
Other
29.6%
Computer Software
30.2%
Financial Services
14.0%
Telecommunications
11.6%
Information Technology and Services
7.0%
Computer & Network Security
7.0%
Other
30.2%
Discussions
Aikido Security has no discussions with answers
Jit has no discussions with answers
Hunting for software insights?
With over 3 million reviews, we can provide the specific details that help you make an informed software buying decision for your business. Finding the right product is important, let us help.
or continue with
or continue with
By proceeding, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy
